CCT Trial: Did Saraki Spend $2m To Bribe The Judge?


The Nigeria’s Code of Conduct Tribunal has discharged Senate president, Bukola Saraki of wrongdoings in the asset declaration trial.

Sahara Reporters in a series of tweets on prior and after the judgement said the Senate President bragged among colleagues and politicians that his trial at the Code of Conduct has been settled and allegedly paid about 2 million dollars to bribe the judge.

Saraki’s position:

The Senate President, through his no-case submission filed before the CCT on May 26, 2017, contended that none of the exhibits tendered and no evidence given by the four prosecution witnesses linked him to the alleged offences to warrant him to defend the charges.

Federal Government’s position:

The prosecuting counsel, Mr. Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), said there was a “serious prima facie case” against the Senate President.

The prosecution had closed its case after its fourth witness, Mr. Bayo Dauda, an official of Guaranty Trust Bank Plc, Ilorin branch, started and concluded his testimony on May 4.

Saraki’s arguments:

Adopting the defendant’s written addresses before the CCT last Thursday, the lead defence counsel, Chief Kanu Agabi (SAN), said the petition which precipitated the charges had nothing to do with Saraki.

Agabi said the charges, especially counts 1, 2, 6, 9,10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 16, had disclosed no valid offences.

He said, “Our submission is that the prosecution has not made out a case warranting an answer from the defendant is dated May 21, 2017 and filed on May 26, 2017. Our reply on point of law is dated June 7, 2017.”

Federal Government’s angle

Jacobs insisted that the prosecution had made out a “serious prima facie case” had been established against the Senate President.

He urged the tribunal to analyse and juxtapose the various asset declaration forms submitted by the defendant to reveal the falsehoods in them.

Jacobs said, “Our response to the no-case submission is dated June 2, 2017 and filed the same day.

“One method your lordship should adopt to show that there is a serious prima facie case against the defendant is to look at Exhibits 6 and 26 which are asset declarations made by the defendant after the investigation of this case.

“My lordships will see that the defendant listed all the properties and stated that they were acquired in 1992 and 1999 and now. If my lord juxtaposes them with Exhibits 1 to 5, some of the properties he claimed (were) acquired in 1999, 2002, and 2003, were not declared.”

Justice Umar Danladi-led team ruling

CCT chairman, Danladi ruled that witnesses evidence against the Senate President, Bukola Saraki were unreliable

Ad ==> A Former One Minute Man Who Now Last 35mins+in Bed Reveals The Secret Of His New Strength.  

Face Comments



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here